Appendix A - Division C

A-1A.2.1.4.    Unsafe Conditions . Although words such as alteration, occupancy, building and unsafe conditions are defined in Article 1.4.1.2. of Division A, such words as reconstruction, demolition, removal and relocation appearing here and elsewhere in the requirements are adequately defined in dictionaries and need not be repeated herein.

A-1A.2.1.5.    Work on Public Property . The appropriate government authority may be federal, provincial or city, depending on the nature of the public property.

A-1A.2.1.6.    Property Changes . Control of change of property boundaries applies to either existing buildings or new construction. If a building is built as close to a boundary line as the regulations permit, moving the boundary could reduce the fire separation below that required and thus place the building in contravention, this Subsection would not apply.

A-1A.3.2.1.    Notice Prior to Work . This Subsection requires the owner to inform the Chief Building Official of changes in responsibilities of certain employees. It is not intended to limit the owner's right to change the constructor, engineer, architect or inspection or testing agency, but rather to let the building official know of any such change so that construction will not be held up because of any misunderstanding as to who is responsible. See Letters of Assurance at the end of Part 2 of Division C.

A-1A.3.3.3.    Uncovering Work . The requirement to uncover and replace work will normally apply only if Article 1A.3.3.1. has not been complied with, that is, if work requiring inspection has been covered prematurely. Complete uncovering may not be necessary. Here, again, the judgment of the designated official is required to determine if partial uncovering, test holes or similar actions will be sufficient to indicate compliance, the purpose being to promote compliance not to penalize the constructor.

A-1A.3.4.1.    Owner Responsible for Compliance . Nothing relieves the owner of responsibility, whatever contractual arrangements the owner may have made with the constructor. If the owner delegates to the constructor the responsibility of carrying out construction in accordance with the requirements, the constructor would be the owner's agent. These circumstances cannot be recognized by the Chief Building Official, however, since the authority is not a party to such arrangements.

A-1A.3.4.3.    Tests to Prove Compliance . Where a manufacturer, fabricator or erector is required to conform to specified requirements, such as those referenced by Articles 4.3.1.2. and 4.3.3.1., it is intended that proof of such compliance be filed with the Chief Building Official. See Letters of Assurance at the end of Part 2 of Division C.

A-1A.4.1.3.    Responsibility . If the constructor goes bankrupt or is unable to continue the job, the owner is responsible. Similarly, if the owner should become unable to carry out his or her responsibilities because of bankruptcy or other reasons, the constructor is responsible to comply with the requirements so far as safety is concerned. The owner must assure that no unsafe condition is left and that any work that is carried out in the absence of the owner complies with the requirements.

The constructor is not responsible for the completion of the building, nor is the contractor responsible under these requirements for matters that are covered by appearance or maintenance regulations.

A-1A.5.1.2.    Filing Documents . No time period for the retention of documents is specified, because this depends upon the city, upon the provincial legislation and upon any statute of limitations that may apply.

A-1A.6.1.1.    Legal Entry . Since these requirements apply to both new construction and existing buildings, the Chief Building Official (i.e., the designated official) has the power to enter any existing buildings as well as new construction, but only for the purpose of administering or enforcing these requirements.

In other words, if there is reason to believe that unauthorized alterations or a change of occupancy has occurred or an unsafe condition exists in respect of fire, structural safety or health, an inspection may be made. The designated official should be informed of any unsafe conditions found in the course of fire inspections.

A-1A.6.1.2.    Scope of Orders . Some of these powers should be utilized only in extreme instances. For example, while the designated official may order the removal of a building constructed in contravention of the requirements, there would be no need to utilize this power if that building can be brought into line with the requirements by additional construction. Similarly, if work being undertaken causes an unsafe condition, the need to order cessation of the occupancy would exist only if that condition could not otherwise be rectified.

A-1A.6.1.6.    Partial or Staged Permit . If the Chief Building Official issues a permit for a foundation before submission of the plans of the complete building, there is no assurance that a permit will be issued for the superstructure when the plans are submitted later. Such issuance will depend upon, among other things, the adequacy of the foundation. This provision is included to give some freedom to the owner to take risks.

A-1A.6.1.7.    Conditional Permits . A conditional permit may be issued is the additional information required is of secondary importance and the foundation or structure is not dependent on it. Information of this type might pertain to building services, such as heating, ventilating, air-conditioning, electrical or plumbing or to partitioning which may not be determined until leases have been arranged. This provision also gives the designated official the latitude to exercise good judgment.

A-1A.6.2.2.    Immediate Measures . The power to take immediate measures to correct a dangerous situation is intended to be used only in conditions of extreme emergency, and its use should be approached with caution. If, for any reason, the owner is unable to act or refuses to act, laying a charge under the Criminal Code will not protect the public against a dangerous situation. It is only when all logical approaches have been exhausted that the designated official should take action. The official should not take this provision as a blanket approval to act, but should be assured in advance that there are no conflicting restrictions on the official's power in other city or provincial Acts.

A-1A.7.2.2.    Application Form . In addition to the information required by this provision, further information is required by Subsection 2.3.4. of Division C, Structural and Foundation Drawings and Calculations, and Subsection 2.3.5. of Division C, Heating, Ventilating, Air-Conditioning and Energy Utilization Drawings and Specifications.

A-1A.7.2.8.    Lapsed Application . Applications for permits must be complete and properly filed. If an application is not proceeded with for 6 months, it must be considered abandoned and can be reinstated only by re-filing after one renewal in writing.

A-1A.8.3.1.    Occupancy Permit . An Occupancy Permit may also be required for a temporary occupancy.

A-2.2.1.2.(1)    Structural Design. Part 4 of Division B is written on the assumption that structural design will be carried out by a professional who is qualified to perform such design. Sentence 2.2.1.2.(1) is not intended to imply that a professional may not also be required in the application of requirements in other Parts of the NBC.

A-2.2.2.2.(1)    Surveys . Every owner should provide an up-to-date survey by a Registered Land Surveyor for

A-2.2.6.2.(1)    Information Required on Drawings and Specifications. Examples of information that should be shown on architectural drawings and drawings for heating, ventilating and air-conditioning systems are:

(a)  the name, type and location of the building,

(b)  the name of the owner,

(c)  the name of the architect,

(d)  the name of the engineer or designer,

(e)  the north point,

(f)  the dimensions and height of all rooms,

(g)  the intended use of all rooms,

(h)  the details or description of the wall, roof, ceiling and floor construction, including insulation,

(i)  the details or description of the windows and outside doors, including the size, weatherstripping, storm sashes, sills and storm doors,

(j)  the size and continuity of all pipes, ducts, shafts, flues and fire dampers,

(k)  the location, size, capacity and type of all principal units of equipment,

(l)  the size, shape and height of all chimneys and gas vents,

(m)  the size and location of all combustion air and ventilation openings, and

(n)  the location and fire-resistance rating of required fire separations.

A-2.2.7.    Professional Design and Review. This Section provides for the use of what are generally called Letters of Assurance. The letters themselves, known as Schedules A, B-1, B-2, C-A and C-B and located at the end of Division C, are intended to put on paper the responsibilities of the owner and various registered professionals in a construction project. The Letters of Assurance do not impose any additional responsibilities on the registered professionals nor are they intended to alter the roles and responsibilities of the authorities having jurisdiction

The Schedules have been very carefully scrutinized by the Province of British Columbia, Union of BC Municipalities, Building Officials’ Association of BC, Architectural Institute of BC, Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of B.C. and their respective legal counsel. The precise wording in the letters is extremely critical and must not be modified. For this reason, authorities having jurisdiction will only accept copies of the original master Schedules as published in Division C. Any notations on these Schedules which are absolutely necessary to suit a particular project must be clearly and legibly marked in pen on the copies.

It is typical that the registered professional responsible for the design is also responsible for the field review. There are instances where this is not the case and having a different registered professional doing the field reviews is unavoidable. Schedule C-B requires that the registered professional that provides the field review provide assurance that the building as finally constructed is in substantial conformance with the Code. It is unreasonable to expect the field reviewer to take on the responsibility for Code compliance of the design done by others. In the event of transition, Schedule C-B must be clarified by the field reviewer by crossing out and initialing Clause (b)(i) and providing the effective transition date.

Note that Schedules A, B-1, B-2, C-A & C-B, as required by Subsection 2.2.7., must be signed and sealed and submitted to the authority having jurisdiction, as applicable for each specific project. Conditional or qualified Schedules are not typically acceptable. Any fire and life safety deficiency that would prevent the issuance of a Schedule must be remedied before the Schedule is released, not accommodated by conditions or qualifications placed on the Schedule. See the Guide to Letters of Assurance, available from the Building Policy Branch Web site, for more details.

A-2.2.7.1.(1)(b)    Structural Components. The reference to “structural components of buildings that fall within the scope of Part 4” includes the situation where a building is classified under Part 9 due to its size and occupancy but also contains some structural components (such as beams supporting concentrated loads) which must be designed under Part 4. In this situation only Schedules B-1, B-2 and C-B for the structural components are required. Schedule A and Schedules B-1, B-2, C-A and C-B relating to non-structural components are not required. Refer to Appendix A-9.4.1.1. and A-9.4.1.1.(3) for structural design of Part 9 buildings for lateral wind and earthquake loads.

A-2.2.7.2.(1)(a)    Coordinating Registered Professional. The coordinating registered professional is responsible to ascertain that all Code related aspects which are relevant to the project are clearly identified by each of the registered professionals in the collection of Schedules B-1 and B-2. If a registered professional has crossed out any item on their Schedule B-2, the coordinating registered professional must confirm this item is not applicable to the project or resolve the issue with the registered professional. Only under unusual circumstances should additional registered professionals within a single discipline be expected to submit Schedules B-1, B-2 and C-B to the coordinating registered professional.

A-2.2.7.2.(1)(b)    Schedule B-2. The purpose of Schedule B-2 is to clearly identify the appropriate registered professional who has the overall responsibility in each discipline for compliance with the various code-related aspects of the project. Detailed design of certain building components may be undertaken by a second registered professional. It is common in the industry for detailed sprinkler design or detailed structural design of open web steel joists to be performed by a second registered professional who may be retained by the contractor or the fabricator. The registered professional of record fulfills their obligation for overall responsibility of Code compliance as indicated in Schedule B-2 by reviewing the shop drawings which are prepared under the direction of the second registered professional. Such shop drawings must bear the professional seal and signature of the second registered professional. Field review of these components can be undertaken by either the registered professional of record or the second registered professional. In the event that the second registered professional provides the field review, the registered professional of record must be satisfied that such reviews have been performed and is responsible for Schedule C-B.

A-2.2.7.2.(1)(c)    Shoring Works in Street or Lane . Where shoring works are proposed to be left in the street and/or lane permanently, an application for the proposal should be made by the owner to the City Engineer. Where the City Engineer is satisfied as to the safety and advisability of the proposal, the City Engineer may approve the basis on which the shoring works may be allowed to remain.

A-2.2.7.2.(2)    Schedule C-A. Schedule C-A provides confirmation that the coordinating registered professional has completed the obligation to coordinate the various registered professionals engaged in the project. It also confirms that the testing of the interrelated fire and life safety systems, such as fire alarms and sprinklers, have been completed and the systems function as intended.

A-2.2.7.3.    Demonstration of the Coordinated Fire & Life Safety Systems. The design drawings and supporting documents must clearly indicate all essential details of the coordinated fire and life safety systems prior to issuance of a building permit. Demonstration of the proper, integrated operation of the fire and life safety systems must be conducted prior to occupancy. The following is an example of the steps required to co-ordinate the installation and testing of fire and life safety systems in buildings.

1.0. General

Referencing Schedule B-2:

The coordinating registered professional (CRP) and registered professionals (RPs) must demonstrate that the fire and life safety systems' design has been coordinated prior to the issuance of the building permit. That is, the CRP/RPs must accumulate and submit the necessary documentation, such as:

to demonstrate that the interface of the fire and life safety systems has been designed and coordinated so that when built correctly they will function as an integrated system. Further, it is intended that when the construction of the fire and life safety systems is indicated by the contractor to be complete, the RPs/CRP witness the demonstration of the testing of the fire and life safety systems to confirm compliance that the as-built systems function as intended by the design.

The required list of items will depend on the simplicity or complexity of the project. The following is a comprehensive list of items for fire and life safety systems for a complex project which need to be coordinated in order to demonstrate compliance:

Notes: It is the responsibility of the coordinating registered professional (CRP) and registered professionals (RPs) to determine the best method of “how to” demonstrate to the authority having jurisdiction (AHJ) that the fire protection and life safety systems have been coordinated for each project. That is, the method(s) used (i.e., charts, drawings, matrices, tables, etc.) for demonstration purposes should be project-specific and relate only to that project.

It is not the intent of this Appendix material to dictate or produce “checklists” or other prescriptive methods for demonstrating compliance since this is best left to the professional discretion of the appropriate CRP/RPs.

2.0 Design Phase — Building Permit Application Stage & Final Construction Phase — Occupancy Permit Application Stage

2.1 Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems

2.1.1. Automatic Sprinkler Systems

2.1.2. Standpipe Systems

2.1.3. Fire Pump Systems

2.1.4. Fire Alarm Systems

2.1.6. Emergency Telephone System

2.1.7. Emergency Power

2.1.8. Emergency Lighting

2.1.9. Exit Signs

2.2. Additional Requirements for High Buildings

2.2.1. Interface Condition between Highrise and Lowrise Components

2.2.2. Smoke Control — Measure A

2.2.3. Smoke Venting

2.2.4. Fire Fighters' Elevators

2.2.5. Protection of Emergency Electrical Conductors

2.2.6. Emergency Voice Communications

3.0. Roles and Responsibilities for the Demonstration of the Coordinated Fire and Life Safety Systems

3.1. Roles and Responsibilities for the Design, Commissioning and Functional Testing of Fire and Life Safety Systems

3.1.1. Design Phase

RPs will clearly indicate on their drawings and supporting documents the details of the fire and life safety systems for each applicable item of Section 2 for their particular discipline. RPs will also coordinate the design of the components in their system with the designs of other RPs on the project. RPs are to indicate what functional testing, system verification, etc., must be performed by the contractor or sub-trades and establish the documentation to be provided.

The CRP will act as the facilitator for the coordination of the design of the fire and life safety systems among the various RPs.

3.1.2. Construction Phase

The contractor will coordinate the activities of the sub-trade contractors for the installation of the fire and life safety systems in accordance with the contract documents.

RPs will provide field reviews to ascertain that the construction of the fire and life safety systems substantially complies with their design.

RPs will review shop drawings of the fire and life safety systems to determine that they accurately reflect their design intent. They will also coordinate their reviews with those of the other RPs on the project.

The CRP will coordinate the shop drawing reviews and field reviews by the RPs with the objective that the entire fire and life safety system will correctly operate as an integrated system.

3.1.3. Occupancy Phase

The contractor will coordinate the sub-trade contractors for the commissioning and functional testing of the fire and life safety systems. The contractor will also collect all of the required occupancy submission documents from the various sub-trade contractors and forward them to the CRP.

The CRP will take the lead role in coordinating the activities of the RPs required for the commissioning and functional testing of the fire and life safety systems. The CRP will develop the project-specific test protocol and procedures in consultation with the RPs and distribute them to the various parties involved in the process.

RPs will ascertain that the appropriate commissioning and functional testing of the fire and life safety systems of the components in their disciplines have been satisfactorily completed by the sub-trade contractors. They will also determine that the appropriate occupancy submission documents have been submitted and filled in correctly.

The CRP will be responsible for collecting all of the required occupancy submission documents, reviewing them for completeness and accuracy, and forwarding them to the AHJ in a complete package prior to the coordinated final AHJ review.

3.2. Sample Summary of Roles and Responsibilities for Demonstration of the Coordinated Fire and Life Safety Systems

The following is a sample summary (only) of the roles and responsibilities for a typical highrise building with underground parking. The precise roles and responsibilities for each project will vary depending on the complexity. The CRP will ascertain that the appropriate roles and responsibilities for each project are fulfilled by the RPs.

3.2.1. Coordinating Registered Professional

Design Phase

Construction Phase

Occupancy Phase

3.2.2. Architectural

Design Phase

Construction Phase

Occupancy Phase

3.2.3. Mechanical/Plumbing

Design Phase

Construction Phase

Occupancy Phase

3.2.4. Fire Suppression

The assurance of sprinkler systems can be accomplished under two possible scenarios:

Scenario 1

Scenario 2

3.2.5. Electrical

Design Phase

Construction Phase

Occupancy Phase

4.0. Sample Occupancy Demonstration/Witnessing Flowchart

DEVELOP TESTING PROTOCOL/PROCEDURE (Design Phase)
CRP/RPs develop Testing Demonstration/Witness Protocol
— Issue to Authorities Having Jurisdiction & Contractor
DOCUMENTATION SUBMISSION
Contractor/Sub-trades submit/deliver all appropriate documentation to CRP/RPs, including:
  — The original Contractor's Materials and Test Certificate for the sprinkler system
— The original Contractor's Materials and Test Certificate for the sprinkler system
— Fire Pump Flow Test Certificate(s)
— Back Flow Prevention Certificate(s)
— Emergency generator commissioning and verification reports
— The original Certificate of Verification for the fire alarm system
— Appendix "A" to the fire alarm verification report
— ULC Certificate for Protective Signaling Service
— Other documentation, as appropriate
CONTRACTOR DEMONSTRATION — CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE
Contractor & Sub-trades
(Mechanical, Electrical, Elevator, Sprinkler, Fire Alarm, etc.) as appropriate
COORDINATED FINAL CONSULTANT REVIEW DEMONSTRATION/WITNESSING
CRP/RPs
(Architect, Mechanical Engineer, Electrical Engineer, Sprinkler Engineer,
Equivalency Consultant, etc.) as appropriate
OCCUPANCY SUBMISSION DOCUMENTS
CRP to collect all submission documents, including Schedule Cs from RPs,
and submit to AHJ in a complete package
COORDINATED FINAL AHJ REVIEW
DEMONSTRATION/WITNESS
Contractor, Sub-trades, CRP/RPs demonstrate to AHJ
(Building, Fire, Mechanical, Electrical and Sprinkler)
OCCUPANCY

A-2.3.1.    Documentation of Alternative Solutions. Beyond the purposes of demonstrating compliance and acquiring a building permit, there are other important reasons for requiring that the proponent of an alternative solution submit project documentation (i.e. a compliance report) to the Chief Building Official and for the Chief Building Official to retain that documentation for a substantial period following the construction of a building: the City requires that a building be maintained in compliance with the codes under which it was built. Alternative solutions made possible by objective-based By-law may have special maintenance requirements, which would be described in the documentation.

A-2.6.3.    Demonstration of the Coordinated Fire & Life Safety Systems . The design drawings and supporting documents must clearly indicate all essential details of the Coordinated Fire & Life Safety Systems prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Demonstration of the proper, integrated operation of the Fire & Life Safety Systems must be conducted prior to issuance of the Occupancy Permit.

Note that Schedules A, B-1, B-2, C-A & C-B, as required by Section 2.6., must be signed and sealed and submitted to the Authority Having Jurisdiction, as appropriate for each specific project.

1.0. General

Referencing Schedule B-2:

The Coordinating Registered Professional (CRP) and Registered Professionals of Record (RPRs) must demonstrate that the Fire and Life Safety Systems' design has been coordinated prior to the issuance of the Building Permit. That is, the CRP/RPRs must accumulate and submit the necessary documentation, such as:

to demonstrate that the interface of the Fire & Life Safety Systems has been designed and coordinated so that when built correctly they will function as an integrated system. Further, it is intended that when the construction of the Fire & Life Safety Systems is indicated by the Contractor to be complete, the RPRs/CRP witness the demonstration of the testing of the Fire & Life Safety Systems to confirm compliance that the as-built systems function as intended by the design.

The required list of items will depend on the simplicity or complexity of the Project. The following is a comprehensive list of items for Fire & Life Safety Systems for a complex project, which must be coordinated in order to demonstrate compliance:

Notes: It is the responsibility of the Coordinating Registered Professional (CRP) & Registered Professionals of Record (RPRs) to determine the best method of "How To" demonstrate to the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) that the Fire & Life Safety Systems have been coordinated for each project. That is, the method(s) used (i.e., charts, drawings, matrices, tables, etc.) for demonstration purposes should be project-specific and relate only to that project.

It is not the intent of this Appendix Material to dictate or produce "checklists" or other prescriptive methods for demonstrating compliance since this is best left to the professional discretion of the appropriate CRP/RPRs.

2.0. Design Phase — Building Permit Application Stage & Final Construction Phase — Occupancy Permit Application Stage

2.1. Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems

2.1.1. Automatic Sprinkler Systems

2.1.2. Standpipe Systems

2.1.3. Fire Pump Systems

2.1.4. Fire Alarm Systems

2.1.6. Emergency Telephone System

2.1.7. Emergency Power

2.1.8. Emergency Lighting

2.1.9. Exit Signs

2.2. Additional Requirements for High Buildings

2.2.1. Interface Condition between Highrise and Lowrise Components (Measure 'N' Vestibules)

2.2.2. Smoke Control — Measure A

2.2.3. Smoke Venting

2.2.4. Fire Fighters' Elevators

2.2.5. Protection of Emergency Electrical Conductors

2.2.6. Emergency Voice Communications

3.0. Roles and Responsibilities for the Demonstration of the Coordinated Fire and Life Safety Systems

3.1. Roles and Responsibilities for the Design, Commissioning and Functional Testing of Fire and Life Safety Systems

3.1.1. Design Phase

RPRs will clearly indicate on their drawings and supporting documents the details of the fire and life safety systems for each applicable item of Section 2 for their particular discipline. RPRs will also coordinate the design of the components in their system with the designs of other RPRs on the project. RPRs are to indicate what functional testing, system verification, etc., must be performed by the Contractor or subtrades and establish the documentation to be provided.

The CRP will develop the project-specific test protocol and procedures in consultation with the RPRs. The CRP will act as the facilitator for the coordination of the design of the fire and life safety systems among the various RPRs.

3.1.2. Construction Phase

The Contractor will coordinate the activities of the subtrade contractors for the installation of the fire and life safety systems in accordance with the contract documents.

RPRs will provide field reviews to ascertain that the construction of the fire and life safety systems substantially complies with their design.

RPRs will review shop drawings of the fire and life safety systems to determine that they accurately reflect their design intent. They will also coordinate their reviews with those of the other RPRs on the project.

The CRP will coordinate the shop drawing reviews and field reviews by the RPs with the objective that the entire fire and life safety system will correctly operate as an integrated system.

3.1.3. Occupancy Phase

The Contractor will coordinate the subtrade contractors for the commissioning and functional testing of the fire and life safety systems. The Contractor will also collect all of the required Occupancy Permit submission documents from the various subtrade contractors and forward them to the CRP.

The CRP will take the lead role in coordinating the activities of the RPRs required for the commissioning and functional testing of the fire and life safety systems. The CRP will distribute the test protocol and test procedures, as developed in the Design Stage, to the various parties involved in the process.

RPRs will ascertain that the appropriate commissioning and functional testing of the fire and life safety systems of the components in their disciplines have been satisfactorily completed by the sub trade contractors. They will also determine that the appropriate Occupancy Permit submission documents have been submitted and filled in correctly.

The CRP will be responsible for collecting all of the required Occupancy Permit submission documents, reviewing them for completeness and accuracy, and forwarding them to the AHJ in a complete package at least 24 hours prior to the Coordinated Final AHJ Review.

3.2. Sample Summary of Roles and Responsibilities for Demonstration of the Coordinated Fire and Life Safety Systems

The following is a sample summary (only) of the roles and responsibilities for a typical highrise building with underground parking. The precise roles and responsibilities for each project will vary depending on the complexity. The CRP will ascertain that the appropriate roles and responsibilities for each project are fulfilled by the RPRs.

3.2.1. Coordinating Registered Professional

Design Phase

Construction Phase

Occupancy Phase

3.2.2. Architectural Design Phase

Construction Phase

Occupancy Phase

3.2.3. Mechanical/Plumbing Design Phase

Construction Phase

Occupancy Phase

3.2.4. Fire Suppression

The design of sprinkler systems can be accomplished by at least two possible scenarios:

Scenario 1

Scenario 2

For purposes of this example, Scenario 2 Roles and Responsibilities are outlined below:

Design Phase by Engineer of Record

Construction Phase by Sprinkler Design Engineer

Construction Phase by Engineer of Record

Occupancy Phase by the Engineer of Record

Occupancy Phase by the Sprinkler Design Engineer

3.2.5. Electrical

Design Phase

Construction Phase

Occupancy Phase

4.0. Sample Occupancy Demonstration/Witnessing Flowchart

DEVELOP TESTING PROTOCOL/PROCEDURE (Design Stage)
CRP/RPRs develop Testing Demonstration/Witness Protocol
— Issue to Authorities Having Jurisdiction & Contractor
DOCUMENTATION SUBMISSION
Contractor/Subtrades submit/deliver all appropriate documentation to CRP/RPRs, including:
  — The original Contractor's Materials and Test Certificate for the sprinkler system
— Fire Pump Flow Test Certificate(s)
— Back Flow Prevention Certificate(s)
— Emergency generator commissioning and verification reports
— The original Certificate of Verification for the fire alarm system
— Appendix "A" to the fire alarm verification report
— ULC Certificate for Protective Signaling Service
— Other documentation, as appropriate
CONTRACTOR DEMONSTRATION — CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE
Contractor & Subtrades
(Mechanical, Electrical, Elevator, Sprinkler, Fire Alarm, etc.) as appropriate
COORDINATED FINAL CONSULTANT REVIEW DEMONSTRATION/WITNESSING CRP/RPRs
(Architect, Mechanical Engineer, Electrical Engineer, Sprinkler Engineer,
Equivalency Consultant, etc.) as appropriate
OCCUPANCY SUBMISSION DOCUMENTS
CRP to collect all submission documents, including Schedule Cs from RPRs,
and submit to AHJ in a complete package
COORDINATED FINAL AHJ REVIEW DEMONSTRATION/WITNESS
Contractor, Subtrades, CRP/RPRs demonstrate to AHJ
(Building, Fire, Mechanical, Electrical and Sprinkler)
OP ISSUED

[Rev. 10, B.C. Reg. 232/2010.]