Appendix A — Division B
Explanatory Material
A-5 Environmental Separation
The
requirements provided in Part 5 pertain to the separation of environmentally dissimilar spaces. Most obvious is the
need to separate indoor conditioned spaces from unconditioned spaces,
the outdoors or the ground. There are also cases where separation
is needed between interior spaces which are intended to provide different
environments. (See also Appendix Notes A-5.1.1.1.(1) and A-5.1.2.1.(1).)
A-5.1.1.1.(1) Scope
Part 5 provides explicit requirements related to the transfer of heat, air, moisture and sound in various forms. Control of the
ingress of radon and other soil gases is addressed by the requirements
related to air leakage.

The effects of Vancouver's maritime climate are well documented. The City's prolonged
stretches of near continuous rainfall, combined with driving winds produce extended
periods of wetting of building exteriors. This extended wetting combined with very
mild year round temperatures means that there are limited periods in which the drying
of an envelope assembly might occur. These factors create an environment where the
possibility of moisture induced deterioration of materials is very high. The choice
of appropriate materials and assemblies for building envelopes is therefore extremely
important in Vancouver.
Consistent application of basic water management principles; deflection, drainage,
drying and durability of materials throughout the design and construction process,
is critical for a successful building envelope assembly in Vancouver's climate. Although
excess moisture in an envelope assembly can come from construction sources, exterior
sources such as rainwater, or interior humidity sources, it has been shown that most
performance problems in Vancouver have resulted from a failure to control exterior
sources. In Vancouver, the first consideration in envelope design should be the deflection
of incident rain with elements such as roof overhangs and the use of flashings with
drip edges to direct water away from a building face. The ability to effectively drain
water, which does penetrate through the cladding, should be the next consideration
for successful envelope assemblies. Since many materials used in the construction
of building envelope assemblies are
susceptible to deterioration or decay if they remain wet, the ability of the assembly
to allow for drying should be considered in the design. However, as the potential
for drying in this climate is relatively limited, it should not be relied upon as
the primary mechanism, and it should be ensured that materials placed in an exterior
envelope assembly do not contain excess moisture before the assembly is enclosed.
Lastly, where the probability exists that materials may be exposed to moisture sources,
it is critical to choose materials which are durable enough to withstand the moisture
until it is dissipated.
Selection and specification of performance criteria for components such as windows
should ensure that the components are also capable of meeting the overall envelope
performance requirements. In addition, the integration of components into the overall
envelope assembly should be carefully considered in the drafting of design documents
and through out the construction process, particularly at the interfaces between components
such as windows and the adjacent wall system. All envelope details should be clearly
shown in the construction documents, using a progressive series of three dimensional
details where correct layering and overlapping of materials needs to be clarified.
For critical building envelope assembly details or new and unique assemblies, full-scale
mock-ups and testing on site are extremely valuable in confirming the performance
of an assembly and in establishing construction standards for the balance of the envelope
construction.
The requirements in Part 5 outline a performance standard for the building envelopes,
but good design practice should go beyond the requirements in these regulations. Issues
such as the quality of detailing, the compatibility of materials used in assemblies,
and a design that allows for the simplicity of on-going maintenance are concerns that
a professional designer should take into account in the design of a successful building
envelope assembly.
Guidance with respect to building science principles and envelope assembly performance
for maritime climates is available from a variety of sources. The Canadian Building
Digest series and many other publications from the National Research Council (NRC)
and in particular from the Institute for Research in Construction (IRC) are valuable
resources. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) has also published a wide
variety of documents which are useful in understanding building science principles
and the application of these principles to residential design and construction. Locally,
courses in building envelope basics, offered as the educational component towards
a Building Envelope Professional accreditation, are administered by the Architectural
Institute of BC. Regular seminars on building envelope issues are also offered on
an industry wide basis by the BC Building Envelope Council.

A-5.1.2.1.(1) Application
Subsection 1.3.3. of Division A specifies that Part 5 applies to all buildings except those within the scope of Part 9 or the scope of the National Farm Building Code of Canada. Because of their intended use, many buildings
need only provide a limited degree of separation from the outdoor environment, the
ground, or between interior spaces. The provisions in Part 5 are written to allow exemptions for these buildings.
Part 5 applies to building elements that separate dissimilar environments and to site
conditions that may affect environmental loading on the building envelope.
The provisions address
- the design and construction, or selection, of building components, such as windows and doors,
- the design and construction of building assemblies, such as walls, floors and roofs,
- the design and construction of the interfaces between the above-mentioned elements, and
- the design or selection, and installation, of site materials, components and assemblies, such as backfill and drainage, and grading.
Part 5 applies not only to building elements that separate indoor space from outdoor space,
but also to those elements that separate indoor space from the ground and that
separate adjacent indoor spaces having significantly different environments.
Indoor spaces that require separation include interior conditioned spaces adjacent
to indoor unconditioned spaces, and adjacent interior conditioned spaces that are
intended to provide different environments. An extreme example of the last would be
a wall that separates an indoor ice rink from a swimming pool.
Some building elements are exposed to exterior environmental loads but do not
separate dissimilar environments. Solid guards on exterior walkways are one example.
Such constructions are subject to the application of Part 5.

This sentence is intended to allow for the exemption of the application of Part 5
to buildings or parts of buildings where it can be shown that due to the intended
use of a building, the full provisions of Part 5 are not necessary. As an example,
buildings such as open parking garages, stadia, and certain park buildings intended
for summer use would only require a limited degree of separation from the exterior
environment. Any proposed exemptions should be discussed with the City of Vancouver
prior to implementation.
A-5.1.2.2.(1) Building Envelope Professional Reviews Scope of Application and Letters of Commitment and Completion
The specific areas of focus for which a Building Envelope Professional is required
to perform reviews are Sections 5.4., 5.5. and 5.6. The duties are described as Building
Envelope Professional design review and enhanced field review. The design review is
required to be completed by a Building Envelope Professional. This review is intended
to ascertain that the design for which they will be giving a commitment of responsibility
for review in the field substantially complies with Part 5 with respect to Sections
5.4., 5.5. and 5.6. The term enhanced field review is used to differentiate the level
of review for which a Building Envelope Professional is responsible, from that which
a registered professional signing for architectural items in Schedules B-1 and B-2
would be responsible. The requirements in Part 5 outline a minimum performance standard,
but these requirements can not address the specific detail concerns which experience
has shown are the primary
source of problems which have resulted in the deterioration of building envelopes.
Building Envelope Professional enhanced field review is intended to address this concern.
It requires that the professional performs field reviews at a sufficient frequency
and reviews a substantial number of the details, which could be potential problem
sources, in order to ascertain that the performance requirements of Part 5 are satisfied.
While a professional may not be able to see all of the details, the level of duty
intended for this enhanced field review is to review as many details as possible rather
than just a representative sampling.
An additional duty of the Building Envelope Professional involves the review of moisture
content present in envelope assemblies prior to enclosure. Exterior walls, in buildings
of structural light framing systems, should not be enclosed when there is sufficient
moisture present to initiate deterioration. While wood may have been delivered to
a construction site kiln dried, exposure to rain during construction may raise the
moisture content to an unacceptable level (above 19 per cent). Water may also have
collected in elements of wall assemblies, such as steel stud tracks, and may lead
to deterioration if not dried out prior to the wall assembly being enclosed.
The Building Envelope Professional is required to assure that all wood framing, structural
members, and sheathing do not exceed 19 per cent moisture content, and all other materials
are dry, prior to the wall assembly being enclosed.
The Articles in Section 5.4 do not define the air tightness limits of a completed
assembly, but only that of the components in an assembly. Therefore, it is a critical
responsibility of the Building Envelope Professional to conduct sufficient design
and field review work in order to be able to ascertain that the continuity of the
air barrier system meets the performance requirements of this Part.
The Building Envelope Professional is required to perform sufficient design and field
review work to ascertain that the installed vapour barrier system meets the performance
requirements of Part 5. The Building Envelope Professional is required to confirm
adequate completeness of the system in order to ensure that vapour diffusion is retarded
at an appropriate wall location and that all inappropriate barriers to diffusion are
eliminated.
Preventing inappropriate barriers to diffusion requires careful attention to detail.
While it is often unintended, envelope assemblies may end up with more than one functional
vapour barrier. As it can never be ensured that an exterior envelope assembly will
always be free of moisture, the drying mechanism must not be blocked, or the trapped
moisture may lead to deterioration of moisture sensitive materials. Drying potential
in the system requires that vapour, driven by a vapour pressure differential (i.e.
from high interior vapour pressure to low exterior vapour pressure) be allowed to
pass to a location in the assembly which is open to exterior air (such as a cavity)
where drying may occur. Plywood sheathing for instance has sufficiently low permeance
that care must be taken in the design of an assembly to ensure that vapour is allowed
to pass the sheathing if it is not intended to act as a vapour barrier. Caution may
also be needed with the over use of
impermeable sheet membrane materials at details such as windows. If the application
is too extensive, the potential for moisture diffusion out of the assembly may be
locally impeded, with a resultant increase in the likelihood of deterioration.
The Building Envelope Professional is required to perform sufficient design and field
review work to ascertain that the installed exterior cladding system meets the performance
requirements of Part 5. The Building Envelope Professional is required to confirm
that the cladding system will provide continuous precipitation protection, the drainage
paths are complete and the flashings as installed over the complete exterior envelope
will function properly.
Where the cladding is a pressure equalized rainscreen application of an Exterior Insulation
Finish System (EIFS) as outlined in A-5.6.1.3.(3), the design review and enhanced
field review is required to be undertaken by a Building Envelope Professional who
has specialized training and experience with EIFS.

A-5.1.4.1. Application of Structural Design to Other Building Elements
Part 4, as currently written, applies primarily to buildings as a whole and to
structural members. Requirements defining structural loads and design to accommodate
or resist those loads, however, apply not only to buildings as a whole and
components that are traditionally recognized as structural members, but also apply
to other elements of the building that are subject to structural loading. This is
addressed to some extent in Part 4 by the requirements that pertain, for example,
to
wind loads on cladding. A range of structural loads and effects, as defined in
Subsection 4.1.2., may be imposed on
non-loadbearing elements such as backing walls, roofing, interior partitions and
their connections. These must generally be addressed using the same load
determination and structural design procedures as used for structural
members.
Responsibility for the structural design of buildings as a whole and their
structural members is commonly assigned to the engineer of record. The application
of Part 4 reflects this, and as such, “non-structural” elements are not
explicitly identified in the Part 4 provisions. Rather the application of Part 4 to
these elements is specified in cross-references from other Parts of the
By-law
, e.g. Part 5, which recognizes the fact that the structural design of these elements is
often carried out by engineers other than the engineer of record.


Part 4 does not generally apply to the structural design of building services,
such as heating, ventilating, air-conditioning, plumbing, electrical, electronic or
fire safety systems, though these may be subject to structural loads. It does,
however, apply to the design of the connections of building services to address
earthquake loads (see Article 4.1.8.18.).
A-5.1.4.1.(4) Past Performance as Basis for Compliance with Respect to Structural Loads
As discussed
in Appendix Note A-5.1.4.1., a range of structural loads and effects can be imposed on materials, components
and assemblies in environmental separators and assemblies exposed
to the exterior. In many instances, compliance with Sentence 5.1.4.1.(1) for structural loads must be determined based on the loads and calculation methods described in Part 4 as specified
in Sentence 5.1.4.1.(2) and the referenced Subsection 5.2.2., e.g. for cladding. In practice, compliance
for some materials, components or assemblies of environmental separators
and assemblies exposed to the exterior is determined by relying on
provisions governing the use of alternative solutions (such as Clause 1.2.1.1.(1)(b) of Division A).
For some very common building elements and installations, however,
there is a very large body of evidence of proven performance over
a long period of time. In these cases, imposing the degree of analysis,
or documentation of performance, required by Part 4 or Section 2.3. of Division C would be unnecessary and onerous. Clause 5.1.4.1.(4)(b) is intended to address these particular cases. Because the constructions are so widely accepted throughout the industry
and the body of evidence is so substantial (though not necessarily
documented in an organized fashion), there should be no question that
detailed analysis or documentation is unnecessary.
Whether compliance of a particular material, component or assembly
may be determined based on past performance depends not only on the
type of material, component or assembly, but also on its intended
function, the particular loads to which it will be subject and the
magnitude of those loads. Because the possible combinations and permutations
are infinite, only guidelines can be provided as to when past performance
is a reasonable basis for determining compliance.
In determining compliance based on past performance, the period
of past performance considered should be a substantial number of years.
For example, 30 years is often used to do life-cycle
cost analysis of the viability of investments in building improvements.
This period is more than long enough for most deficiencies to show
up. There should be no question as to the structural adequacy of a
material, component or assembly that has been successfully used in
a given application for such a period.
The determination of compliance may be based on past performance
only where the function of the material, component or assembly is
identical to that of the materials, components or assemblies used
as a reference, and where the expected loads do not exceed those imposed
on the reference materials, components or assemblies. For example,
the acceptance of gypsum board, and its fastening, to serve as part
of the backing wall supporting cladding cannot be based on the performance
of gypsum board that has served only as an interior finish.
The determination of compliance may be based on past performance
only where the properties of the material, component or assembly are
identical or superior to those of the materials, components or assemblies
used as a reference. For example, where a component of a certain gauge
of a particular metal has provided acceptable performance, the same
component made of the same metal or a stronger one would be acceptable.
Compliance with respect to various loads may be determined individually.
A particular material may have to be designed to Part 4 to establish
acceptable resistance to wind or earthquake loads, for example, but
past performance may be adequate to determine that the material and
normal fastening will support the material's dead load and will resist
loads imposed by thermal and moisture-related expansion and contraction.
Past performance is a reasonable basis for determining compliance
for lighter materials, components or assemblies not subject to wind
load; for example, semi-rigid thermal insulation installed in wall
assemblies where other materials, components or assemblies are installed
to resist air pressure loads.
Past performance is an appropriate basis for determining compliance
for some smaller elements that will be subject to wind loads but are
continually supported or fastened behind elements that are designed
for wind loads, for example, standard flashing over wall penetrations.
It should be noted that this particular approach to demonstrating
compliance pertains only to the resistance or accommodation of structural
loads described in Part 4. The resistance or accommodation of environmental
loads, resistance to deterioration, and material compatibility must
still be addressed in accordance with Part 5.
A-5.1.4.1.(5)(b) and (c) Deflection
It is well understood that the deflection of the backing assembly
in a wall can have significant effects on the performance of the cladding.
For example, Clauses 9.14.3 and 10.14.3 of CSA S304.1, “Design of Masonry Structures,” specifies the maximum deflection criteria for backing assemblies to masonry veneer. Clauses 5.1.4.1.(5)(b) and (c) are written in very general terms in recognition of the fact that not only can the deflection of cladding
affect the performance of the backing assembly, but that the excessive
deflection of any element has the potential to adversely affect the
performance of any adjacent element. Such effects must be avoided
or accommodated.
A-5.1.4.2. Deterioration
Environmental loads that must be considered include but are not limited to: sound,
light and other types of radiation, temperature, moisture, air pressure, acids and
alkalis.
Mechanisms of deterioration include:
- structural (impact, air pressure)
- hygrothermal (freeze-thaw, differential movement due to thermal expansion and contraction, ice lensing)
- electrochemical (oxidation, electrolytic action, galvanic action, solar deterioration)
- biochemical (biological attack, intrusion by insects and rodents).
Information on the effects of deformations in building elements can be found in
the Commentary entitled Effects of Deformations in Building Components in the User's
Guide – NBC 2010, Structural Commentaries (Part 4 of Division B).
Resistance to deterioration may be determined based on field performance,
accelerated testing or compliance with guidelines provided by evaluation agencies
recognized by the Chief Building Official.
Building components must be designed with some understanding of the length of time
over which they will effectively perform their intended function. Actual service
life will depend on the materials used and the environment to which they are
exposed. The design should take into consideration these factors, the particular
function of the component and the implications of premature failure, the ease of
access for maintenance, repair or replacement, and the cost of repair or
replacement.
Many buildings are designed such that access for maintenance, repair or
replacement is not possible without damaging—or seriously risking
damaging—other building elements. This can become a considerable deterrent to
proper maintenance thus compromising the performance of the subject materials,
components and assemblies, or other elements of the building. In cases where it is
known or expected that maintenance, repair or replacement is likely to be required
for certain elements before such time as the building undergoes a major retrofit,
special consideration should be given to providing easy access to those
elements.
Where the use of a building or space, or the services for a building or space, are
changed significantly, an assessment of the impact of the changes on the
environmental separators should be conducted to preclude premature failures that
could create hazardous conditions.
A-5.2.1.1.(3) Soil Temperatures
In theory, soil temperatures are needed to determine the conformance
of a design to the requirements related to heat transfer and vapour
diffusion. In practice, standard construction in a particular area
may have proven to perform quite adequately and detailed calculations
of soil temperature are unnecessary. (See also Sentence 5.2.1.3.(2).)
A-5.2.1.2.(1) Interior Environmental Loads
The interior environmental conditions required depend on the
intended use of the spaces in the building as defined in the building
program. Spaces in different types of buildings and different spaces
within a single building may impose different loads on the separators
between interior and exterior spaces and between adjacent interior
spaces. The separators must be designed to withstand the expected
loads.

As regards materials, components and assemblies and their interfaces that are
installed in buildings to which Part 5 applies, the effects of earthquake loads on
their ability to resist or accommodate environmental loads are generally only taken
into account in the design of post-disaster buildings. For all other buildings,
damage to building components during seismic events is anticipated and these
buildings are not intended to be functional after the event. However, for
post-disaster buildings, seismic effects must be taken into account in the design
for environmental separation, as these buildings are required to have an adequate
degree of functionality after the design event to meet their intended function (see
Article 4.1.8.13. for deflections and drift limits for post-disaster buildings).
However, it is important to note that earthquake effects must be
taken into account in the seismic design of all building materials, components and
assemblies and their interfaces covered by Article 4.1.8.18. to address life safety and the structural protection of
buildings.

A-5.2.2.2. Resistance to Wind and Other Air Pressure Loads
The wind load provisions apply to roofing
and other materials subject to wind-uplift loads.
Note that, although Article 5.2.2.2. is specifically concerned with wind loads and directly references only one Article
from Part 4, Sentence 5.2.2.1.(1) references all of Part 4 and would invoke Article 4.1.7.4. for example, which is concerned with air pressure loads on interior walls and partitions.
A-5.3. Heat Transfer
In addressing
issues related to health and safety, Section 5.3. calls up levels of thermal resistance needed to minimize condensation on
or within environmental separators, and to ensure thermal conditions
appropriate for the building use. Energy regulations, where they exist,
specify levels of thermal resistance required for energy efficiency
or call up energy performance levels, which relate to levels of thermal
resistance. Where Part 5 calls for levels of thermal resistance higher than those required by the energy regulations,
the requirements of Part 5 take precedence.
A-5.3.1.1. Required Resistance to Heat Transfer
The control of heat flow is required wherever there is an intended
temperature difference across the building assembly. The use of the
term “intended” is important since, whenever interior space is separated
from exterior space, temperature differences will occur.
The interior of an unheated warehouse, for example, will often
be at a different temperature from the exterior due to solar radiation,
radiation from the building to the night sky and the time lag in temperature
change due to the thermal mass of the building and its contents. If
this temperature difference is not “intended,” no special consideration
need be given to the control of heat flow.
If the warehouse is heated or cooled, thus making the temperature
difference “intended,” some consideration would have to be given to
the control of heat flow.
It should be noted, however, that in many cases, such as with
adjacent interior spaces, there will be an intended temperature difference
but the difference will not be great. In these cases, the provisions
to control heat flow may be little or no more than would be provided
by any standard interior separator. That is, materials typically used
in the construction of partitions may provide the separation needed
to meet the requirements of Section 5.3. without adding what are generally considered to be “insulating” materials.
A-5.3.1.2. Material and Component Properties and Condensation
Total prevention of condensation is
generally unnecessary and its achievement is rarely a certainty at
design conditions. Part 5, therefore, requires that condensation be minimized. The occurrence of condensation should
be sufficiently rare, or the quantities accumulated should be sufficiently
small and dry rapidly enough, to avoid material deterioration and
the growth of mould and fungi.


A-5.3.1.2.(1) Use of Thermal Insulation or Mechanical Systems for Environmental Control
The level of thermal resistance required to avoid condensation on the warm side of
an assembly or within an assembly (at the vapour barrier), and to permit the
maintenance of indoor conditions appropriate for the occupancy depends on
- the occupancy
- the exterior design air temperature
- the interior design air temperature and relative humidity
- the capacity of the heating system, and
- the means of delivering heat.
To control condensation on the interior surface of an exterior wall, for example,
the interior surface must not fall below the dew point of the interior air. If, for
instance, the interior air is 20°C and 35
per cent
RH, the dew point will be 4°C. If the interior air is 20°C and 55
per cent
RH, the dew point will be 11°C.




Where the exterior design temperature is mild, such as in south coastal British
Columbia, the interior RH during the heating season may well be around 55
per cent
. With an exterior temperature of -7°C, the materials in the environmental separator would
have to provide a mere RSI 0.082 to avoid condensation on the interior surface.
Depending on the specific properties of the material, this RSI might be provided by
10-mm plywood. Therefore, materials generally recognized as thermal insulation would
not be required only to limit condensation on the warmer side of the building
envelope.


In other areas of the province, exterior design temperatures are much lower. In these
cases,
maintaining temperatures inboard of the vapour barrier above the dew point will
require insulation or increased heat delivery to the environmental separator. Direct
delivery of heat over the entire surface of the environmental separator is generally
impractical. Indirect heat delivery may not be possible without raising the interior
air temperatures above the comfort level. In any case, increased heat delivery would
often entail excessive energy costs.
In addition to controlling condensation, interior surface temperatures must be
warm enough to avoid occupant discomfort due to excessive heat loss by radiation.
Depending on the occupancy of the subject spaces, this may require the installation
of insulation even where it is not needed to control condensation.
A-5.3.1.3.(2) Position of Materials Providing Thermal Resistance
For a material providing thermal resistance
to be effective, it must not be short-circuited by convective airflow
through or around the material. The material must therefore be either
- the component of the air barrier system providing principal resistance to air leakage, or
- installed in full and continuous contact with a continuous low air permeance component.
A-5.4.1.1. Resistance to Air Leakage
An air barrier system in above-grade building components and
assemblies separating conditioned space from the exterior will reduce
the likelihood of condensation due to air leakage, discomfort from
drafts, the infiltration of dust and other pollutants, and interference
in the performance of building services, such as HVAC and plumbing.
These problems can all lead to serious health or safety hazards.
Currently, the most obvious and significant problems are due
to moisture-related material deterioration, such as rot and corrosion,
which can lead to the failure of component connections. The infiltration
of dust and other pollutants can lead to a wide range of health problems.
Where the separator is subject to high moisture levels, the pollutants
may include fungus spores. Interference with the performance of building
services can lead to unhealthy conditions and potentially hazardous
conditions during the heating season in many regions of the country.
There are few buildings intended for human occupancy where the
interior space is conditioned but where an air barrier system is not
required. Some industrial buildings, for example, may be exempt. This
would depend, however, on the particular levels of interior conditioning
provided, ventilation levels, protection provided for the workers,
and the tolerance of the building’s construction to the accumulation
of condensation and potential precipitation ingress.
Some industrial buildings are provided with only limited conditioning,
for example radiant heating, and ventilation levels are sufficient
to reduce relative humidity to a level at which condensation will
not accumulate to a degree that is problematic. Conversely, some industrial
buildings, due to the processes they contain, operate at very high
temperatures and high ventilation levels. In these cases, the building
envelope will be maintained at temperatures that will avoid condensation.
In both examples above, either the ventilation rates or protective
gear required in the work environment would protect the occupants
from unacceptable levels of pollutants.
Where adjacent interior environments are sufficiently different,
controlling airflow between those spaces is necessary to maintain
conditions. Referring again to the industrial building examples above,
assemblies separating office space from the work floor would likely
require an air barrier system.
The word “minimize” is used in Clause 5.4.1.1.(1)(c) because not all moisture accumulation in an assembly need be of concern. Incidental
condensation is normal but should be sufficiently rare and in sufficiently
limited quantities and should dry rapidly enough to avoid material
deterioration and the growth of mould or fungi.

In addition to an air barrier system, other measures may be
required to reduce the radon concentration to a level below the guideline
specified by Health Canada. Further information on protection from
radon ingress can be found in:
- “Radon: A Guide for Canadian Homeowners” (CMHC/HC),
- “Guide for Radon Measurements in Public Buildings (Schools, Hospitals, Care Facilities, Detention Centres)” (HC), and
- EPA 625/R-92/016, “Radon Prevention in the Design and Construction of Schools and Other Large Buildings.”
A-5.4.1.2.(1) and (2) Air Leakage through the Air Barrier System
Material Requirements
The current requirements specify only a maximum air leakage rate for the material
in the air barrier system that provides the principal resistance to air leakage.
The report, “Air Permeance of Building Materials,” prepared by AIR-INS Inc. for CMHC
identifies, from 36 common building materials, 19 that would comply with the leakage
limit of 0.02 L/(s•m2) at 75 Pa. Air leakage characteristics greater than the maximum of 0.02 L/(s•m2) at 75 Pa may be acceptable where
- exterior temperatures are mild,
- the moisture content of the indoor air is low,
- the assembly is resistant to moisture-related deterioration,
- higher vapour permeance materials are installed toward the cold side of the assembly, or
- the air barrier system separates two interior spaces that are not intended to provide significantly different environments.
System Requirements
Ideally, a maximum air leakage rate for the complete air barrier system would be specified.
The maximum acceptable rate will ultimately depend on warm and cold side temperatures
and humidity conditions, and on the susceptibility of the environmental separator
to moisture-related deterioration. Recommended maximum leakage rates for the air barrier
system in an exterior envelope in most locations in Canada are shown in Table A-5.4.1.2.(1) and (2). These values are for air barrier systems in opaque, insulated portions of the building envelope. They are not for whole buildings, as windows, doors and other openings are
not included. The Table is provided for guidance when testing air barrier systems
as portions of an envelope.
Table A-5.4.1.2.(1) and (2) Recommended Maximum Air Leakage Rates Forming part of Sentence 5.4.1.2.(1) | |
Warm Side Relative Humidity at 21°C |
Recommended Maximum System Air Leakage Rate, L/(s•m2) at 75 Pa |
< 27% | 0.15 |
27 to 55% | 0.10 |
> 55% | 0.05 |
Determining the leakage rate of a particular assembly, however, is problematic. There
is little information available on the airtightness of the many air barrier systems
used in building construction, and testing requires specialized equipment and expertise.
Depending on the type of test,
- testing may not represent the performance of the complete installed system,
- the location of deficiencies may be difficult to identify, and
- rectification of deficiencies may not be feasible.
Despite the difficulties, when using a system whose performance is not known, it is
recommended that tests be conducted. Testing options include:
- laboratory tests of small sections of the air barrier system, including the joints and intersections of different assemblies
- laboratory tests of large wall sections
- in-situ tests of characteristic envelope areas.
A-5.5.1.1. Required Resistance to Vapour Diffusion
Resistance to vapour diffusion is required to reduce the likelihood
of condensation within building assemblies, and the consequent potential
for material deterioration and fungal growth. Deterioration such as
rot and corrosion can lead to the failure of building components and
connections, and interfere with the performance of building services.
Some fungi can have very serious effects on health.
In Canada, relatively few buildings that are subject to temperature
and vapour pressure differences would be constructed or operated in
such a manner that the control of vapour diffusion would not need
to be addressed in their design. Assemblies enclosing certain industrial
spaces, as described in Appendix Note A-5.4.1.1. for example, may be exempt.
For residential spaces, and most other spaces that are conditioned
for human occupancy, a means of vapour diffusion control is generally
agreed to be necessary, even in the milder climates of the country.
The questions in those cases pertain to the degree of control needed.
The word “minimize” is used in Sentence 5.5.1.1.(1) because not all moisture accumulation in an assembly need be of concern. Incidental
condensation is normal but should be sufficiently rare and in sufficiently
limited quantities, and should dry rapidly enough, to avoid material
deterioration and the growth of mould or fungi. Here are some references
regarding the effects of fungi on health:
- HC 2004, “Fungal Contamination in Public Buildings: Health Effects and Investigation Methods”
- “Guidelines on Assessment and Remediation of Fungi in Indoor Environments,” New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (NYCDOHMH)
A-5.5.1.2.(1) Vapour Barrier Materials and Installation
In the summer, many buildings are subject
to conditions where the interior temperature is lower than the exterior
temperature. Vapour transfer during these periods is from the exterior
to the interior. In general, in Canada, the duration of these periods
is sufficiently short, the driving forces are sufficiently low, and
assemblies are constructed such that any accumulated moisture will
dissipate before deterioration will occur.
Buildings such as freezer plants, however, may operate for much
of the year at temperatures that are below the ambient exterior temperature.
In these cases, the “warm” side of the assembly would be the exterior
and a detailed analysis on an annual basis is required.
Steady state heat transfer and vapour diffusion calculations
may be used to determine acceptable permeance levels for the vapour
barrier and to identify appropriate positions for the vapour barrier
within the building assembly.
A-5.6.1.1. Required Protection from Precipitation
Windows, cast-in-place concrete walls, and metal and glass curtain
wall systems are examples of components and assemblies that, when
properly designed and constructed, are expected to prevent the ingress
of precipitation into a building. Assemblies such as roofs and veneer
walls consist of materials specifically intended to screen precipitation.
Components and assemblies separating interior conditioned space
from the exterior are generally required to provide protection from
the ingress of precipitation. Components and assemblies separating
interior unconditioned space from the exterior may or may not be required
to provide protection from the ingress of precipitation. Buildings
such as stadia, parking garages and some seasonally occupied buildings,
for example, may not require complete protection from the ingress
of precipitation. The degree of protection will depend to a large
extent on the materials selected for the building elements that will
be exposed to precipitation.
The word “minimize” is used in Sentence 5.6.1.1.(1) because not all moisture ingress or accumulation in an assembly need be of
concern. The penetration of wind-driven rain past the cladding may
not affect the long-term performance of the assembly, provided the
moisture dries out or is drained away before it initiates any deterioration
of building materials. When the design service life of a material
or component is longer than the design service life of the overall
assembly, taking into account the expected exposure to moisture, initiating
deterioration of the material should not be of concern. That is to
say, provided the material or component continues to provide the necessary
level of performance for its intended service life and does not adversely
affect the service life of the assembly of which it is a part, the
deterioration of the material or component is not an issue.

Water leakage through sloped roofs is often due to the formation of ice dams at the
eaves, which can be limited by controlling the transfer of heat to the roof through
a combination of insulation and venting to dissipate heat. See Clause 5.3.1.2.(1)(d).
Draining Moisture with Protective Materials
This City of Vancouver Building By-law differs from the provincial and national codes
in its approach to the requirements for handling of precipitation. Experience has
shown that it is virtually impossible to make face sealed walls work in the Vancouver
climate, in anything beyond a very low exposure condition. The intent of Section 5.6.
is to illustrate to the designer that a rainscreen design is the minimum acceptable
option for vertical exterior envelope assemblies in Part 5 buildings. Where there
is a slope in any element of the envelope, it should be considered a roof and treated
accordingly.
Where the system is a mass wall construction type, and does not include a cladding,
all joints between panels (and junctions to other elements such as windows) are required
to be two-stage or rainscreen joints with an appropriate means to drain any accumulated
moisture to the exterior.
Exterior Cladding over Structural Light Framing
Exterior cladding shall be installed over a cavity with all the necessary through
wall flashings designed to drain accumulated moisture to the exterior, where the wall
system incorporates exterior cladding over structural light wood or steel framing
systems,. This cavity, a water shedding plane on the interior side of the cavity and
a complete air barrier system to achieve pressure moderation, constitute the primary
elements of a required rainscreen design. Compartmentalization of the cavity, in particular
at corners, is required to achieve effective pressure moderation. Where the cladding
material is stiffer than the supporting light frame structure, such as in a stucco
application, the compartmentalization should include though wall flashing at each
floor. The design of the cavity should minimize the potential for water to bridge
across this gap and maximize the free air space.
While there is agreement on the need for a cavity, current research is not conclusive
on the optimal width of a cavity to maximize drying potential, however a conservative
approach would suggest that the widest allowable cavity would be prudent in this environment,
where drying is an issue. As other Sections of this By-law limit a cavity in a wall
to 25 mm before requiring fire stopping, a 19 mm (3/4") cavity is the minimum width recommended which will satisfy this requirement, while
still maximizing the drying potential for an assembly with insulation in the stud
space. [See Clause 3.1.11.2.(2)(d)]
Where the envelope system employs a full membrane application on the outside of the
sheathing and where all of the insulation is installed outboard, then the width of
the cavity may be reduced, since the drying potential is not as critical in this configuration.
Research has shown that a 10 mm gap is sufficient to prevent liquid water from bridging
across a cavity. Therefore, a cavity width of 12 mm (1/2") is the minimum recommended for this configuration, provided that the application
of the cladding and the insulation is constructed so that the Building Envelope Professional
can assure that this 12 mm (1/2") gap can be maintained.
Exterior columns, beams, walkways, guardrails, or other elements, which do not form
a direct continuation of the building enclosure, may not be required to be constructed
as rainscreen assemblies. For this approach to be acceptable, these elements must
be totally constructed with pressure treated lumber and sheathing (field treated at
cuts and boltholes) or other durable materials, with corrosion resistant fasteners
and be provided with proper ventilation.
Exterior Insulation Finish Systems over Light Structural Steel Framing
Subject to specific limitations, the required cavities in Exterior Insulation Finish
Systems may be reduced in dimension provided they form part of a pressure equalized
rainscreen system. This approach would not be acceptable where the application is
over wood framing.
As there are no standards for EIFS listed in Section 5.6.1., specific reviews would
be required to qualify for this approach. Material systems are required to conform
to the CCMC Technical Guide for "Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems (EIFS) Class
PB Masterformat Section 07240" and a listing at CCMC is required to be obtained. Pressure
equalization is required to be demonstrated by testing as defined by the Institute
for Research in Construction, Construction Technology Update No. 17; "Pressure Equalization
in Rainscreen Wall Systems," July 1998.
Design review and enhanced field review is required to be conducted by a Building
Envelope Professional who has specialized training and experience with EIFS. The professional
is required to review the project specific design, and confirm that the whole system
including the required thermal expansion/contraction joints, joints around doors or
windows, or any other penetrations of the finish will allow for drainage back to the
exterior, without reliance on surface sealing. The professional is also responsible
for reviewing the pressure equalization system including compartmentalization, vent
location and sizing and confirm the required stiffness of the substrate using calculations
based on the manufacturer's data.
The quality provisions of the CCMC Technical Guide for "Exterior Insulation and Finish
Systems (EIFS) Class PB Masterformat Section 07240", Section 7.0 "Quality Assurance
Program" must be adhered to. Buildings are required to be designed incorporating devices
such as davit bases or other design elements, so that any required maintenance could
be provided without causing undue damage to the EIFS.


As the first principle for water management in a building envelope is deflection,
the appropriate use of flashings, drips or overhangs is a critical part of any precipitation
protection system. The 1996 CMHC survey of envelope failures in B.C. found a striking
inverse relationship between the length of overhang, and the percentage of walls which
experienced water induced problems. Roof overhangs perform a more complex function
than that as a simple 'umbrella' shielding the wall below. Studies have shown that
a large proportion of the precipitation incident on any building face will be deposited
on an overhang at the top of a wall due to wind movement and water deposition patterns.
If the overhang includes a means to shed this water, a large portion of the precipitation
can be deflected without it ever touching the rest of the building face. Proper detailing
and lapping of flashings with other materials is also critical to prevent the ingress
of
precipitation where there are changes in planes of walls and roofs, changes in cladding
material, or window or door heads and sills.
Information on the installation of flashing to drain water to the exterior of roof
or wall assemblies may be found in a number of publications including, but not limited
to:
- "Roofing Practices Manual," Roofing Contractors Association of British Columbia
- "Best Practice Guide: Flashings," Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation
- "Technical Notes," Masonry Institute of British Columbia
- "Architectural Sheet Metal Manual," Sheet Metal and Air-Conditioning Contractors National
Association, Inc.
A-5.6.2.1. Sealing and Drainage
Providing a surface-sealed, durable, watertight cover on the outside
of a building is difficult. Where there is a likelihood of some penetration
by precipitation into a component or assembly, drainage is generally
required to direct the moisture to the exterior.
The degree of protection against precipitation ingress needed
in any particular case and the approach taken to provide that protection
will depend on
- the exterior loads imposed on the assembly
- the materials selected for the backing assembly,
- the use of the enclosed space, and
- the level of maintenance that will be acceptable to the owners.
Where exterior loads are greater, it may be prudent to select
a precipitation protection system whose small failures will not be
as likely to have an immediate impact on the building or its occupants.
Basic rainscreen assemblies, for example, are typical for low-rise
residential buildings. Open rainscreen assemblies are generally used
for high-rise buildings where the cost of maintenance and repair could
be high.
Where materials with a greater resistance to moisture are used
in the assembly, a less rugged precipitation protection system or
a less rigorous maintenance schedule may be acceptable. This might
be the case, for example, where the wall or backing wall is concrete
or masonry.
For spaces that are not intended for on-going human occupancy,
some rainwater leakage may not be of particular concern. This may
be the case for certain warehouse spaces for example, depending on
how the spaces are used and conditioned.
Information on the installation of flashing to drain water to
the exterior of roof and wall assemblies may be found in a number
of publications including, but not limited to:
- “Architectural Sheet Metal Manual,” Sheet Metal and Air-Conditioning Contractors National Association, Inc.
- “High-Rise Residential Construction Guide,” Tarion Warranty Corporation (formerly Ontario New Home Warranty Program)
- Technical Notes, National Concrete Masonry Association
- Roofing Specifications, Canadian Roofing Contractors’ Association
- “Roofing Manual: Membrane Roof Systems” and “Waterproofing Manual,” National Roofing Contractors Association
- Technical Notes on Brick Construction, Brick Industry Association

Where a roof or balcony is entirely enclosed by parapet walls there is a likelihood
of drains becoming obstructed with materials such as leaves falling during heavy autumn
rains. It is recommended that a secondary means of drainage such as scuppers be provided.
Overflow outlets should be installed in the parapet walls in sufficient number and
at an appropriate height to drain the roof or balcony, to avoid water backing up into
moisture sensitive assemblies, and to prevent structural collapse from ponding.

A-5.8.1.1.(1) Required Drainage
A wall or floor located below the water table or in the path of a
watercourse will be subject to continuous hydrostatic pressure. In
such cases, the provision of drainage will be ineffective and the
wall or floor must be made waterproof to prevent water ingress.
Where a wall or floor is subject to intermittent hydrostatic
pressure, as may result from seasonal flooding, proper drainage will
facilitate the drying out of the soil. In some cases, reducing exposure
to high moisture levels will extend the life of the moisture protection.
Where a wall or floor is not subject to hydrostatic pressure,
drainage again reduces the exposure to high moisture levels and allows
less than waterproof treatment of the wall or floor.
A-5.8.2. Moisture Protection
Moisture
protection for building elements in contact with the ground is generally
categorized as either waterproofing or dampproofing. Waterproofing
provides a continuous protection against water ingress and is intended
to resist hydrostatic load. Dampproofing, on the other hand, does
not provide a seal against water ingress and cannot withstand hydrostatic
pressure.
In general, Part 5 requires walls, floors and roofs in contact with the ground to be waterproofed. Properties
of waterproofing are specified in Sentences 5.8.2.2.(2) to (5), and waterproofing material standards are referenced in Table 5.10.1.1. Materials intended to be used as dampproofing rather than waterproofing are generally not permitted [Sentence 5.8.2.2.(6)]. Standards for installing waterproofing are also specified [Sentence 5.8.2.3.(1)].
Part 5 does permit the use of dampproofing in lieu of waterproofing where the substrate is cast-in-place concrete,
a drainage layer is installed and where the assembly will not be exposed
to hydrostatic pressure. Material standards are referenced in Clause 5.8.2.2.(7)(b) and installation methods in Sentence 5.8.2.3.(2).
A-5.8.2.1. Required Moisture Protection
The control of the ingress of moisture from the ground into
interior space is not related to the type of building, the use of
the space, or whether or not the space is conditioned. This recognizes
the potential adverse effects of high humidity levels, with or without
standing water, on both the health of the building occupants and the
durability of the building structure.
Although a subject interior space may not be occupied, the assembly
separating this space from occupied space often cannot be relied upon
to provide adequate protection for the building occupants. Depending
on the construction of the separating assembly, it may also be subject
to moisture-related deterioration.
The exceptions to this requirement stated in Sentence 5.8.2.1.(2) recognize only those cases where the subject interior space is not occupied and where the assembly separating this space
from occupied space will provide the required protection and be resistant
to a high humidity environment, or where the moisture loads are sufficiently
limited as to not adversely affect the building or its occupants.
A-5.8.2.2.(7) Drainage Layers
Drainage layers reduce both structural and moisture loading on the
building envelope by breaking capillary flow and allowing water to
percolate quickly to the drainage system. A drainage layer may consist
of permeable materials including granular backfill, geosynthetic drainage
products or mineral fibreboard with oriented fibres to facilitate
drainage. Where a granular material is used, it should be protected
from contamination by fines from the adjacent native soil or additional
material should be installed to ensure that an adequate thickness
of the granular material remains free of fines.
A-5.9. Required Protection from Noise
Sentence 5.9.1.2.(1) applies to the separation of dwelling units from other dwelling units with regard to sound transmission
irrespective of Clause 5.1.2.1.(1)(b), which deals with the separation of dissimilar environments. It is understood that, at any
time, there is the potential for sound levels to be quite different
in adjoining dwelling units.
A-5.9.1.1.(1) Sound Transmission
The Tables in Appendix Note A-9.10.3.1. provide information on the typical sound transmission class ratings of a number
of building assemblies. In the absence of test information or results
for a specific assembly of materials, the values given in Tables A-9.10.3.1.A and A-9.10.3.1.B are considered to satisfy the intent of Sentence 5.9.1.1.(1).
A-5.10.1.1.(1) Selection of Materials and Components and Compliance with Referenced Standards
It is important
to note that Sentence 5.10.1.1.(1) is stated in such a way that the selection of materials and components is not limited to those
traditionally recognized as serving particular functions or those
for which a standard is identified in Table 5.10.1.1. This approach permits more flexibility than is provided by similar requirements
in Part 9. As long as the selected material meets the performance requirements stated elsewhere in Part 5, the material may be used to serve the required function.
However, where the selected material or component, or its installation,
falls within the scope of any of the standards listed in Table 5.10.1.1., the material, component or installation must comply with that standard. For example, if some resistance to heat transfer
is required between two interior spaces and standard partition construction
will provide the necessary resistance, the installation of one of
the “thermal insulation” materials identified in the standard list
is not required. If, on the other hand, one decides to install glass
fibre insulation, the material must conform to CAN/ULC-S702, “Mineral Fibre Thermal Insulation for Buildings.”

Analysis of many sealant joint failures indicates that the majority of failures can
be attributed to improper joint preparation and deficient installation of the sealant
and various joint components. The following ASTM guidelines describe several aspects
that should be considered when applying sealants in unprotected environments to achieve
a durable application:
The sealant manufacturer’s literature should always be consulted for recommended procedures
and materials.

A-5.10.2.1.(3) Airtightness and Watertightness of Wired Glass Windows
Fixed wired glass assemblies are
sometimes permitted as closures in vertical fire separations. The
airtightness and watertightness requirements are waived for these
windows when used in such an application, in recognition of the fact
that the availability of assemblies that meet both the requirements
of the window standards and the requirements for fire resistance may
be limited. However, control of air and water leakage should not be
ignored: measures should be taken to attempt to comply with applicable
requirements.

Design Values
CSA A440S1 requires that the individual performance levels achieved by the product
for structural resistance, water penetration resistance and air leakage resistance
be reported on the product’s performance label.
Storm Doors and Windows
Where storm doors and storm windows are not incorporated in a rated window or door
assembly, they should be designed and constructed to comply with the applicable requirements
of Part 5 regarding such properties as appropriate air leakage and structural loads.
Forced Entry Test
Even though the performance label on rated windows, doors and skylights does not explicitly
indicate that the product has passed the forced entry resistance test, products are
required to pass this test in order to be rated.
Installation and Field Testing of Windows, Doors, Skylights and Other Glazed Products
Windows, doors, skylights, other glazed products and their components require installation
details that are appropriately designed and constructed to provide acceptable overall
performance of a building envelope assembly. Proper design of installation details
provides the information necessary to integrate the window, door or skylight’s structure,
air barrier, vapour barrier and water barrier functions into the overall design of
the building envelope assembly for these functions. Proper construction of these details
is necessary to achieve an appropriate level of long term performance. Further guidance
on installation detailing for windows, doors, skylights and other glazed products
and their components can be found in CSA A440.4, “Window, Door and Skylight Installation."
Field testing of installed windows, doors and skylights during construction can be
an invaluable tool for verifying acceptable levels of performance for the installed
system. Although not required by this Code, field testing early in the envelope construction
phase is considered favourable such that discontinuities in the system can be readily
identified and corrections made before construction of the entire assembly is completed.
Additional field testing during the construction phases can also be used to monitor
installation consistency. Further guidance on methods and guidelines for the field
testing of windows, doors and skylights can be found in CSA A440.4, “Window, Door
and Skylight Installation, Annex D - Field Testing of Window and Door Installations."
While this document does list previously identified industry performance data values,
it is important to note that the user should utilize current specific performance
requirements for a project as governed by the values developed in the referenced standard
AAMA/WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440, “NAFS – North American Fenestration Standard/Specification for Windows, Doors, and Skylights.”
Field test procedures should be in accordance with referenced test standards, such
as ASTM E783, “Standard Test Method for Field Measurement of Air Leakage Through Installed
Exterior Windows and Doors” and ASTM E1105, “Standard Test Method for Field Determination
of Water Penetration of Installed Exterior Windows, Skylights, Doors, and Curtain
Walls, by Uniform or Cyclic Static Air Pressure Difference.”


It is intended that any fenestration product that conforms to this Part may choose
to comply with either Clause (a) or Clause (b) of Sentence 5.10.2.2.(1). Even if a product is in scope of the standards referenced via Clause (b) (NAFS and the Canadian Supplement to NAFS), the compliance path in Clause (a) may be used. However, it is not intended that the compliance path in Clause (b) be used where fenestration products are not within the scope of the referenced standards.
A-5.10.2.2.(2) Other Glazed Products
Glazed products such as curtain walls or sloped glazing that are not typically considered
windows but are installed as part of a separation described in Sentence 5.10.2.1.(1) are not within the scope of the referenced standards and therefore must conform to Subsection 5.1.4. and Sections 5.3., 5.4. and 5.6.
A-5.10.2.2.(4) Loads and Procedures
For windows within the scope of the “Canadian Supplement” referred to in Sentence 5.10.2.2.(1), structural and wind loads are included and may be calculated in accordance with that standard. As an alternative, structural and wind loads from Section 5.2. may be used to select fenestration products that are appropriate for the point of installation. Values derived from the referenced standard, which uses a simplified
calculation method, are typically higher than those derived from calculations done
in conformance with Section 5.2.

A-5.10.2.4.(3) Heat Transfer through Fire-Rated Glazed Assemblies
Thermal bridging through fire-rated
glazed assemblies should not be ignored; measures should be taken
to minimize condensation consistent with the intent of Sentence 5.10.2.4.(2).